On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 09:19:57 +0200 Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Speaking of limiting scope... > > Fair point :-) > > I see you have applied this already to the -mm tree. Shall I still move the iterator? > The hope is to remove the 'iter' variable altogether when there are no uses after > the loop anymore. I don't really understand the question. My plan is to merge your patch with my fixlet immediately prior to sending upstream.
