David, i came up with the following approach, i drop the sloppy booleans from cifs/nfs and leave it at fs_context level , let me know what you think and ill send as new version : diff --git a/fs/cifs/fs_context.c b/fs/cifs/fs_context.c index 7ec35f3f0a5f..5a8c074df74a 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/fs_context.c +++ b/fs/cifs/fs_context.c @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ static int smb3_fs_context_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, if (!skip_parsing) { opt = fs_parse(fc, smb3_fs_parameters, param, &result); if (opt < 0) - return ctx->sloppy ? 1 : opt; + return fc->sloppy ? 1 : opt; } switch (opt) { @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ static int smb3_fs_context_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, ctx->multiuser = true; break; case Opt_sloppy: - ctx->sloppy = true; + fc->sloppy = true; break; case Opt_nosharesock: ctx->nosharesock = true; diff --git a/fs/cifs/fs_context.h b/fs/cifs/fs_context.h index e54090d9ef36..52a67a96fb67 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/fs_context.h +++ b/fs/cifs/fs_context.h @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ struct smb3_fs_context { bool uid_specified; bool cruid_specified; bool gid_specified; - bool sloppy; bool got_ip; bool got_version; bool got_rsize; diff --git a/fs/fs_context.c b/fs/fs_context.c index 24ce12f0db32..3c1c999fc1fb 100644 --- a/fs/fs_context.c +++ b/fs/fs_context.c @@ -155,8 +155,14 @@ int vfs_parse_fs_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param) if (ret != -ENOPARAM) return ret; - return invalf(fc, "%s: Unknown parameter '%s'", - fc->fs_type->name, param->key); + /* We got an invalid parameter, but sloppy may have been specified + * later on param string. Let's wait to process whole params to return + * EINVAL */ + + fc->param_inval = true; + errorf(fc, "%s: Unknown parameter '%s'",fc->fs_type->name, param->key); + + return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_parse_fs_param); @@ -227,6 +233,9 @@ int generic_parse_monolithic(struct fs_context *fc, void *data) } } + if (!fc->sloppy && fc->param_inval) + ret = -EINVAL; + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_parse_monolithic); diff --git a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c index ea17fa1f31ec..c9ff68e17b68 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c +++ b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int nfs_fs_context_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, opt = fs_parse(fc, nfs_fs_parameters, param, &result); if (opt < 0) - return ctx->sloppy ? 1 : opt; + return fc->sloppy ? 1 : opt; if (fc->security) ctx->has_sec_mnt_opts = 1; @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int nfs_fs_context_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, * Special options */ case Opt_sloppy: - ctx->sloppy = true; + fc->sloppy = true; dfprintk(MOUNT, "NFS: relaxing parsing rules\n"); break; } diff --git a/fs/nfs/internal.h b/fs/nfs/internal.h index 12f6acb483bb..9febdc95b4d0 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/internal.h +++ b/fs/nfs/internal.h @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ struct nfs_fs_context { bool internal; bool skip_reconfig_option_check; bool need_mount; - bool sloppy; unsigned int flags; /* NFS{,4}_MOUNT_* flags */ unsigned int rsize, wsize; unsigned int timeo, retrans; diff --git a/include/linux/fs_context.h b/include/linux/fs_context.h index 13fa6f3df8e4..06a4b72a0f98 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs_context.h +++ b/include/linux/fs_context.h @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ struct fs_context { bool need_free:1; /* Need to call ops->free() */ bool global:1; /* Goes into &init_user_ns */ bool oldapi:1; /* Coming from mount(2) */ + bool sloppy:1; /* If fs support it and was specified */ + bool param_inval:1; /* If set, check sloppy value */ }; struct fs_context_operations { On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:29 PM David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > With addition of fs_context support, options string is parsed > > sequentially, if 'sloppy' option is not leftmost one, we may > > return ENOPARAM to userland if a non-valid option preceeds sloopy > > and mount will fail : > > > > host# mount -o quota,sloppy 172.23.1.225:/share /mnt > > mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified > > host# mount -o sloppy,quota 172.23.1.225:/share /mnt > > host# > > > > This patch correct that behaviour so that sloppy takes precedence > > if specified anywhere on the string > > It's slightly overcorrected, but that probably doesn't matter. > > I wonder if we should put a "bool sloppy" in struct fs_context, put the > handling in vfs_parse_fs_param() (ie. skip the error message). > > David >