On 1/24/22 04:19, Jan Kara wrote:
...
this maybe wrong but thinking out loudly, have you consider adding a
ZERO_PAGE() address check since it should have a unique same
This crossed my mind, but I thought I might be missing something better
on the submission side, such as some way to do all of this without a
zero page.
address for each ZERO_PAGE() (unless I'm totally wrong here) and
using this check you can distinguish between ZERO_PAGE() and
non ZERO_PAGE() on the bio list in bio_release_pages().
Well, that is another option but it seems a bit ugly and also on some
architectures (e.g. s390 AFAICS) there can be multiple zero pages (due to
coloring) so the test for zero page is not completely trivial (probably we
would have to grow some is_zero_page() checking function implemented
separately for each arch).
Good point. And adding an is_zero_page() function would also make some
of these invocations correct across all architectures:
is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page))
...so it would also be a fix or at least an upgrade.
I had also wondered why there is no is_zero_page() wrapper function for
the above invocation. Maybe because there are only four call sites and
no one saw it as worthwhile yet.
Anyway, this looks viable, thanks for the quick responses!
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
