Re: Request for review: NandFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
There are so many things to improve in UBI/UBIFS, and there
is a possibility to create a scalable UBI2. You may do a lot
of exciting things in the area, instead.

What's in Corentin's code that UBI/UBIFS could learn from? Or have you reviewed it that closely?


Please, think about joining us instead :-)

Of course, if NandFS is better than UBI/UBIFS, then maybe you should think about joining him instead! :)


b.g.

--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux