Dave Kleikamp: > > > For a regular file, the size of the upper inode is not the same as the > > > size of the lower inode. The lower inode includes the header blocks > > > which are not visible in the upper inode. So ecryptfs_interpose() will > > > overwrite the correct upper inode size. ::: > It's restoring i_size to the correct value after ecryptfs_interpose > updates it with the wrong value. Does "ecryptfs_interpose() will overwrite the correct upper inode size" means ecryptfs_interpose() sets a wrong value? If so, I can understand why ecryptfs_link() sets i_size. J. R. Okajima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html