On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 11:17 +0900, hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Dave Kleikamp: > > For a regular file, the size of the upper inode is not the same as the > > size of the lower inode. The lower inode includes the header blocks > > which are not visible in the upper inode. So ecryptfs_interpose() will > > overwrite the correct upper inode size. > > Then it means updating i_size in ecryptfs_link() is unnecessary... It's restoring i_size to the correct value after ecryptfs_interpose updates it with the wrong value. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
