Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > At least IMHO.
> > 
> > ( What could _perhaps_ change the picture a bit IMO is drivers/staging/ i 
> >   think - we could take a far more active role in certain types of 
> >   projects that have been done out of tree typically, with no formal
> >   promise for compatibility - or something like that. )
> 
> So if staging would have existed +one year ago, we should probably have 
> included squashfs 3.3 at that time, and just have moved it to fs/ once 
> the V4 layout was finished?

might have been a possibility - although there's a notable absence of any 
filesystem drivers in the latest drivers/staging/ set.

Greg, is that just accidental (no one has submitted one yet) or is it some 
sort of policy?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux