On Sat, 10 January 2009 13:43:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > What does a performance hit have to do with an ABI? Absolutely nothing - > if such a bug is noticed it is fixed, that's it. Your argument does not > parse and makes absolutely zero technical sense. > > Your "ABI is forever" objection against a _read only_ filesystem is a > newbie mistake worthy of cookie file inclusion - i had a real good laugh > when i read it ;-) Thank you, glad to be of service. Should I have picked an example where the code becomes horribly convoluted and there is nothing you can do about it? But since I am clearly the newbie, could you try to teach my stupid ass instead of just ridiculing it? What is the thing that makes a read only filesystem special? And why does everyone believe that I am arguing against merging squashfs when I'm not? Jörn -- The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing. -- John Powell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
