Re: [PATCH v7 04/19] iov_iter: Turn iov_iter_fault_in_readable into fault_in_iov_iter_readable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:53 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I really disagree with these calling conventions.  "Number not faulted in"
> is bloody useless

It's what we already have for copy_to/from_user(), so it's actually
consistent with that.

And it avoids changing all the existing tests where people really
cared only about the "everything ok" case.

Andreas' first patch did that changed version, and was ugly as hell.

But if you have a version that avoids the ugliness...

             Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux