On 8/17/21 3:39 PM, Tony Battersby wrote: > On 8/17/21 5:28 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> >> Another approach - don't allow TWA_SIGNAL task_work to get queued if >> PF_SIGNALED has been set on the task. This is similar to how we reject >> task_work_add() on process exit, and the callers must be able to handle >> that already. >> >> Can you test this one on top of your 5.10-stable? >> >> >> diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c >> index 07afb5ddb1c4..ca7c1ee44ada 100644 >> --- a/fs/coredump.c >> +++ b/fs/coredump.c >> @@ -602,6 +602,14 @@ void do_coredump(const kernel_siginfo_t *siginfo) >> .mm_flags = mm->flags, >> }; >> >> + /* >> + * task_work_add() will refuse to add work after PF_SIGNALED has >> + * been set, ensure that we flush any pending TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL work >> + * if any was queued before that. >> + */ >> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)) >> + tracehook_notify_signal(); >> + >> audit_core_dumps(siginfo->si_signo); >> >> binfmt = mm->binfmt; >> diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c >> index 1698fbe6f0e1..1ab28904adc4 100644 >> --- a/kernel/task_work.c >> +++ b/kernel/task_work.c >> @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, >> head = READ_ONCE(task->task_works); >> if (unlikely(head == &work_exited)) >> return -ESRCH; >> + /* >> + * TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL notifications will interfere with >> + * a core dump in progress, reject them. >> + */ >> + if ((task->flags & PF_SIGNALED) && notify == TWA_SIGNAL) >> + return -ESRCH; >> work->next = head; >> } while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, head, work) != head); >> >> > Doesn't compile. 5.10 doesn't have TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL. Oh right... Here's one hacked up for the 5.10 TWA_SIGNAL setup. Totally untested... diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c index c6acfc694f65..9e899ce67589 100644 --- a/fs/coredump.c +++ b/fs/coredump.c @@ -603,6 +603,19 @@ void do_coredump(const kernel_siginfo_t *siginfo) .mm_flags = mm->flags, }; + /* + * task_work_add() will refuse to add work after PF_SIGNALED has + * been set, ensure that we flush any pending TWA_SIGNAL work + * if any was queued before that. + */ + if (signal_pending(current) && (current->jobctl & JOBCTL_TASK_WORK)) { + task_work_run(); + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + current->jobctl &= ~JOBCTL_TASK_WORK; + recalc_sigpending(); + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + } + audit_core_dumps(siginfo->si_signo); binfmt = mm->binfmt; diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c index 8d6e1217c451..93b3f262eb4a 100644 --- a/kernel/task_work.c +++ b/kernel/task_work.c @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, head = READ_ONCE(task->task_works); if (unlikely(head == &work_exited)) return -ESRCH; + /* + * TWA_SIGNAL notifications will interfere with + * a core dump in progress, reject them. + */ + if ((task->flags & PF_SIGNALED) && notify == TWA_SIGNAL) + return -ESRCH; work->next = head; } while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, head, work) != head); -- Jens Axboe