Re: [PATCH 11/30] iomap: add the new iomap_iter model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 11:20:17AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> The history of the gluecode that enables us to walk a bunch of extent
> mappings.  In the beginning it was the _apply function, but now in our
> spectre-weary world, you've switched it to a direct loop to reduce the
> number of indirect calls in the hot path by 30-50%.
> 
> As you correctly point out, there's no /code/ shared by the two
> implementations, but Dave and I would like to preserve the continuity
> from one to the next.
> 
> > > I'll send the updated patches as replies to this series to avoid
> > > spamming the list, since I also have a patchset of bugfixes to send out
> > > and don't want to overwhelm everyone.
> > 
> > Just as a clear statement:  I think this dance is obsfucation and doesn't
> > help in any way.  But if that's what it takes..
> 
> I /would/ appreciate it if you'd rvb (or at least ack) patch 31 so I can
> get the 5.15 iomap changes finalized next week.  Pretty please? :)

I think it is a really stupid idea, so certainly no rvb or ack from me.
If you feel you want to do it this way go ahead, but I do not in any
way approve of it.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux