On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:17:08PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > iter.c is also my preference, but in the end I don't care too much. > > Ok. My plan for this is to change this patch to add the new iter code > to apply.c, and change patch 24 to remove iomap_apply. I'll add a patch > on the end to rename apply.c to iter.c, which will avoid breaking the > history. What history? There is no shared code, so no shared history and. > > I'll send the updated patches as replies to this series to avoid > spamming the list, since I also have a patchset of bugfixes to send out > and don't want to overwhelm everyone. Just as a clear statement: I think this dance is obsfucation and doesn't help in any way. But if that's what it takes..
