Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] durability vs performance for flash devices (especially embedded!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/9/21 3:53 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Consumer devices are pushed to use the highest capacity emmc class
> devices, but they have horrible write durability.
> 
> At the same time, we layer on top of these devices our normal stack -
> device mapper and ext4 or f2fs are common configurations today - which
> causes write amplification and can burn out storage even faster. I think
> it would be useful to discuss how we can minimize the write
> amplification when we need to run on these low end parts & see where the
> stack needs updating.
> 
> Great background paper which inspired me to spend time tormenting emmc
> parts is:
> 
> http://www.cs.unc.edu/~porter/pubs/hotos17-final29.pdf

Without having read that paper, has zoned storage been considered? F2FS
already supports zoned block devices. I'm not aware of a better solution
to reduce write amplification for flash devices. Maybe I'm missing
something?

More information is available in this paper:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3458336.3465300.

Thanks,

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux