Re: [PATCH, resend] relatime: Let relatime update atime at least once per day

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:24:55PM +0100, ?ric Piel wrote:
Yes, it might bring important drawbacks: performance-wise, relatime will
become more like atime, making it much less useful. There is also a
significant number of desktop computers that are turned on once a day,
the boot time may get hindered by those additional writes.

Huh?  Nobody's ever claimed that atime writes cost a significant amount
of performance.  The problem that relatime is designed to solve is

I believe Ingo Molnar did - http://kerneltrap.org/node/14148 .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux