Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:34:24PM +0530, Ankit Jain wrote: >> 2. Should the corresponding ioctls be removed from ocfs2? > > Well, a small amount of the code in fs/ocfs2/ioctl.c can certainly go away. > Shouldn't we be talking about doing the same for xfs too? Reading the code a bit, my understanding is that as compat_ioctl is also supported and that just delegates to ioctl (ocfs2_ioctl), so we can't remove the *_RESVSP* handling. Same goes for xfs also. Does that sound fair or did I not understand it correctly? -Ankit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
