Mark Fasheh wrote:
>> 2. Should the corresponding ioctls be removed from ocfs2?
>
> Well, a small amount of the code in fs/ocfs2/ioctl.c can certainly go away.
> Shouldn't we be talking about doing the same for xfs too?
Yep. I'll cook up cleanup patches for these two and post them.
-Ankit
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Jain <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/ioctl.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/open.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> include/linux/falloc.h | 19 ++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/fs.h | 2 +
>> 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
>> index 43e8b2c..5e565c8 100644
>> --- a/fs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> #include <linux/writeback.h>
>> #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
>> +#include <linux/falloc.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/ioctls.h>
>>
>> @@ -346,6 +347,37 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_block_fiemap);
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_BLOCK */
>>
>> +/*
>> + * This provides compatibility with legacy XFS pre-allocation ioctls
>> + * which predate the fallocate syscall.
>> + *
>> + * Only the l_start, l_len and l_whence fields of the 'struct space_resv'
>> + * are used here, rest are ignored.
>> + */
>> +static int ioctl_preallocate(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct inode *inode = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
>> + struct space_resv sr;
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&sr, (struct space_resv __user *) arg, sizeof(sr)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + switch (sr.l_whence) {
>> + case SEEK_SET:
>> + break;
>> + case SEEK_CUR:
>> + sr.l_start += filp->f_pos;
>> + break;
>> + case SEEK_END:
>> + sr.l_start += i_size_read(inode);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return do_fallocate(filp, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, sr.l_start, sr.l_len);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int file_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>> unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> @@ -361,6 +393,11 @@ static int file_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>> return put_user(inode->i_sb->s_blocksize, p);
>> case FIONREAD:
>> return put_user(i_size_read(inode) - filp->f_pos, p);
>> + case F_IOC_RESVSP:
>> + case F_IOC_RESVSP64:
>> + case F_IOC_UNRESVSP:
>> + case F_IOC_UNRESVSP64:
>> + return ioctl_preallocate(filp, arg);
>
> This patch is not implementing proper support for F_IOC_UNRESVSP and
> F_IOC_UNRESVSP64, so why are you catching those here? To be more clear,
> those are used for freeing space in a file ("puching holes"), which
> fallocate is not set up to do right now.
> --Mark
>
> --
> Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
