On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:10:35PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We currently do not maky use of this feature and should we implement > something like this in the future it's trivial to add it back. Looks like that ->upgrade_mask field never made it into mainline? Either way removing and unused mask always seems valid, so: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
