On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:29 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:17:58PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > There's a lot of larger things that need to > > be addressed in general to support the volume approach inside file systems > > that is going to require a lot of work inside of VFS. If you feel like > > tackling that work and then wiring up btrfs by all means have at it, but I'm > > not seeing a urgent need to address this. Thanks, > > That's precisely what I what I want to hear me about. Things like this. > Would btrfs be the ony user of volumes inside filesystem? Jeff had > mentioned before this could also allow namespaces per volumes, and this > might be a desirable feature. > > What else? Wouldn't this be useful for union filesystems like OverlayFS? Or other filesystems that support nested filesystems like bcachefs? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
