On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:17:58PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > There's a lot of larger things that need to > be addressed in general to support the volume approach inside file systems > that is going to require a lot of work inside of VFS. If you feel like > tackling that work and then wiring up btrfs by all means have at it, but I'm > not seeing a urgent need to address this. Thanks, That's precisely what I what I want to hear me about. Things like this. Would btrfs be the ony user of volumes inside filesystem? Jeff had mentioned before this could also allow namespaces per volumes, and this might be a desirable feature. What else? Luis
