Re: [PATCH v9 1/9] iov_iter: add copy_struct_from_iter()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:04:23AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:33:20AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:05:22AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:51 PM Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > + *
> > > > + * The recommended usage is something like the following:
> > > > + *
> > > > + *     if (usize > PAGE_SIZE)
> > > > + *       return -E2BIG;
> > > 
> > > Maybe this should be more than a recommendation, and just be inside
> > > copy_struct_from_iter(), because otherwise the "check_zeroed_user()"
> > > call might be quite the timesink for somebody who does something
> > > stupid.
> > 
> > I did actually almost send this out with the check in
> > copy_struct_from_iter(), but decided not to for consistency with
> > copy_struct_from_user().
> > 
> > openat2() seems to be the only user of copy_struct_from_user() that
> > doesn't limit to PAGE_SIZE, which is odd given that Aleksa wrote both
> 
> Al said there's nothing wrong with copying large chunks of memory so we
> shouldn't limit the helper but instead limit the callers which have
> expectations about their size limit:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190905182801.GR1131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks for the context. So I guess it makes sense to keep the check
"recommended" for both functions.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux