On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:55:01AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 28-01-21 15:12:27, bingjingc wrote: > > From: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The uid/gid (unsigned int) of a domain user may be larger than INT_MAX. > > The parse_options of isofs and udf will return 0, and mount will fail > > with -EINVAL. These patches try to handle large user and group ID. > > > > BingJing Chang (3): > > parser: add unsigned int parser > > isofs: handle large user and group ID > > udf: handle large user and group ID > > Thanks for your patches! Just two notes: > > 1) I don't think Matthew Wilcox gave you his Reviewed-by tag (at least I > didn't see such email). Generally the rule is that the developer has to > explicitely write in his email that you can attach his Reviewed-by tag for > it to be valid. Right, I didn't. Looking at fuse, they deleted their copy of match_uint in favour of switching to the fs_parameter_spec (commit c30da2e981a703c6b1d49911511f7ade8dac20be) and I wonder if isofs & udf shouldn't receive the same attention.
