Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 28-01-21 15:12:27, bingjingc wrote:
> From: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The uid/gid (unsigned int) of a domain user may be larger than INT_MAX.
> The parse_options of isofs and udf will return 0, and mount will fail
> with -EINVAL. These patches try to handle large user and group ID.
> 
> BingJing Chang (3):
>   parser: add unsigned int parser
>   isofs: handle large user and group ID
>   udf: handle large user and group ID

Thanks for your patches! Just two notes:

1) I don't think Matthew Wilcox gave you his Reviewed-by tag (at least I
didn't see such email). Generally the rule is that the developer has to
explicitely write in his email that you can attach his Reviewed-by tag for
it to be valid.

2) Please split the cleanup of kernel doc comments in lib/parser.c in a
separate patch. It is unrelated to adding parse_uint() function so it
belongs into a separate patch (we occasionally do include small unrelated
cleanups if they are on the same line we change anyway but your changes
definitely triggered my treshold of this should be a separate patch).

Thanks!

								Honza

> 
>  fs/isofs/inode.c       |  9 +++++----
>  fs/udf/super.c         |  9 +++++----
>  include/linux/parser.h |  1 +
>  lib/parser.c           | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux