Re: thin provisioned LUN support & file system allocation policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:35:13AM -0500, jim owens wrote:
>
> I'm talking DISK wear not SSD.  The array vendors who are causing
> this problem are doing petabyte san devices, not SSDs.
>
> Rewriting the same sectors causes more bad block remaps
> until the drive eventually runs out of remap space.

How much of a disk wear factor is there with modern disk drives?  The
heads aren't touching the disk, and we have plenty of sectors which
are constantly getting rewritten with traditional filesystems, with no
ill effects as far as I know.  For example, FAT filesystems, the
superblock, block allocation bitmaps all are constantly getting
rewritten today, and I haven't heard of disk manufacturers complaining
that this is a horrible thing.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux