Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > mask=1 bit=0: "attribute not set on this file" > mask=1 bit=1: "attribute is set on this file" > mask=0 bit=0: "attribute doesn't fit into the design of this fs" Or is "not supported by the filesystem driver in this kernel version". > mask=0 bit=1: "filesystem is lying snake" I like your phrasing :-) > It's up to the fs driver and not the vfs to set attributes_mask, and > therefore (as I keep pointing out to XiaoLi Feng) xfs_vn_getattr should > be setting the mask. Agreed. I think there's some confusion stemming from STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT - but that's supported by the *vfs* not by the filesystem. David
