Re: [patch] fs: improved handling of page and buffer IO errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:28:01PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > BTW, why do you want strict coherency for memory mappings?  It's not
> > > something POSIX mandates.  It's not even something that Linux always
> > > did.
> > 
> > Or does, for that matter, on those architectures which have virtually
> > addressed caches.
> 
> Careful with those slurs you're throwing around.  PA-RISC carefully
> aligns its mmaps so they are coherent.

(Unless you use MAP_FIXED?)

Last time I looked at the coherency code, there appeared to be a few
bugs on some architectures, but I didn't have the architectures to
test and confirm them.  It was a long time ago, in the 2.4 era though.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux