Re: [patch] fs: improved handling of page and buffer IO errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:28:01PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > BTW, why do you want strict coherency for memory mappings?  It's not
> > something POSIX mandates.  It's not even something that Linux always
> > did.
> 
> Or does, for that matter, on those architectures which have virtually
> addressed caches.

Careful with those slurs you're throwing around.  PA-RISC carefully
aligns its mmaps so they are coherent.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux