On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 04:23:36AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:50:43AM +1100, npiggin@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > In the range_cont case, range_start is set to index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, but
> > index is a pgoff_t and range_start is loff_t, so we can get truncation of the
> > value on 32-bit platforms. Fix this by adding the standard loff_t cast.
> >
> > This is a data interity bug (depending on how range_cont is used).
>
> Aneesh has a patch to kill the range_cont flag, which is queued up for
> 2.6.28.
Which tree is this queued up in? It's not in ext4 or the mm tree...
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
