Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Shared blocks must not be overwritten to the block device when
> > unmounted - but they might be safe to *read*, e.g. by LILO.
> 
> I guess my terminalogy wasn't clear enough.  I didn't mean shared by
> multiple files, but different areas in one block used by different
> files, e.g. reiserfs tail merging or ufs fragments.  These things always
> were a pain in the neck for lilo.

Fair enough.

Ok, without getting in the way any more :-) it would be good to
clarify in the description whether !(flags & FIEMAP_EXTENT_ENCODED)
means only reading is allowed, or if it means writing over the data
blocks is safe too.

Just so that filesystems will know whether to set the flag for blocks
which can be read but not written.  This may include tail-merged
blocks.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux