On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:44 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So please. Can we just make a simple extended statfs() and be done > with it, instead of this hugely complex thing that does five different > things with the same interface and makes it really odd as a result? How do you propose handling variable size attributes, like the list of fs options? Otherwise I'm fine with a statx-like interface for querying fs/mount attributes. Thanks, Miklos