On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:21 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > If we're going to go the route of changing the CQE, how about:
> > >
> > > struct io_uring_cqe {
> > > __u64 user_data; /* sqe->data submission passed back */
> > > - __s32 res; /* result code for this event */
> > > - __u32 flags;
> > > + union {
> > > + struct {
> > > + __s32 res; /* result code for this event */
> > > + __u32 flags;
> > > + };
> > > + __s64 res64;
> > > + };
> > > };
> > >
> > > then we don't need to change the CQE size and it just depends on the SQE
> > > whether the CQE for it uses res+flags or res64.
> >
> > How do you return a status code or short write when you just have
> > a u64 that is needed for the offset?
>
> it's an s64 not a u64 so you can return a negative errno. i didn't
> think we allowed short writes for objects-which-have-a-pos.
If we are doing this for zone-append (and not general cases), "__s64
res64" should work -.
64 bits = 1 (sign) + 23 (bytes-copied: cqe->res) + 40
(written-location: chunk_sector bytes limit)
--
Joshi
