On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:19:43AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:24:24PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:35 PM Christian Brauner > > <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:25:55PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Christian Brauner > > > > <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hey Miklosz, > > > > > hey Amir, > > > > > > > > > > We've been observing regressions in our containers test-suite with > > > > > commit: > > > > > > > > > > Author: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Date: Tue Mar 17 15:04:22 2020 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > ovl: separate detection of remote upper layer from stacked overlay > > > > > > > > > > Following patch will allow remote as upper layer, but not overlay stacked > > > > > on upper layer. Separate the two concepts. > > > > > > > > > > This patch is doesn't change behavior. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you sure this is the offending commit? > > > > Look at it. It is really moving a bit of code around and should not > > > > change logic. > > > > There are several other commits in 5.7 that could have gone wrong... > > > > > > Yeah, most likely. I can do a bisect but it might take a little until I > > > get around to it. Is that ok? > > > > > > > ok. > > I thought you pointed to a commit that you bisected the regression to. > > I guess not. > > I think this is only an Ubuntu problem, it looks like someone did some > bad conflict resoluation when rebasing a sauce patch onto 5.7. Yeah, I just saw this as well. Sorry for the noise. Christian
