Re: overlayfs regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:35 PM Christian Brauner
<christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:25:55PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Christian Brauner
> > <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Miklosz,
> > > hey Amir,
> > >
> > > We've been observing regressions in our containers test-suite with
> > > commit:
> > >
> > > Author: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:   Tue Mar 17 15:04:22 2020 +0100
> > >
> > >     ovl: separate detection of remote upper layer from stacked overlay
> > >
> > >     Following patch will allow remote as upper layer, but not overlay stacked
> > >     on upper layer.  Separate the two concepts.
> > >
> > >     This patch is doesn't change behavior.
> > >
> > >     Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> >
> > Are you sure this is the offending commit?
> > Look at it. It is really moving a bit of code around and should not
> > change logic.
> > There are several other commits in 5.7 that could have gone wrong...
>
> Yeah, most likely. I can do a bisect but it might take a little until I
> get around to it. Is that ok?
>

ok.
I thought you pointed to a commit that you bisected the regression to.
I guess not.

Thanks,
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux