Re: [PATCH 0/2] MMC discard support (was [PATCH 0/7] Discard requests, v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:49:07 +0900
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 
>> That doesn't have improvement? E.g. it means the results
>> 
>> 	dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/xxx
>> and
>> 	./discard_all /dev/xxx
>> 	dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/xxx
>> 
>> are same? Or FAT doesn't have?
>
> I have tried those two and others, and I cannot see any noticeable
> difference in performance. Please perform your own tests though as I
> might have overlooked something.

I see, sounds like erase commands of sd/mmc was ignored. It's
interesting results, and I'd like to test and see the detail of it,
however, unfortunately I don't have proper devices now.

Anyway, thanks for info.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux