Re: [PATCH 0/2] MMC discard support (was [PATCH 0/7] Discard requests, v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 22 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:24:48 +0200
>> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > I agree with that, the thought did cross my mind earlier as well. I
>> > committed something like the below (in two patches). Do you want me to
>> > queue up your mmc patches as well?
>> > 
>> 
>> As it stands, no. If nobody can find a measurable improvement then this
>> code is just more things that can go wrong.
>
> It could just be that the device you tested with doesn't do anything
> with the discard information. But I agree, until there's a verified
> benefit to adding the code, we can leave it be.

That doesn't have improvement? E.g. it means the results

	dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/xxx
and
	./discard_all /dev/xxx
	dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/xxx

are same? Or FAT doesn't have?
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux