Hello Ted,
Sorry about the long delay. Had taken some time off and was tinkering
around with another hobby project.
On 5/21/20 11:56 PM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:54:56AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
This adds process name and pid for ext4_msg().
I found this to be useful. For e.g. below print gives more
info about process name and pid.
[ 7671.131912] [mount/12543] EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: acl,user_xattr
I'm not entirely sure about adding the command/pid at the beginning of
the message. The way we do this in ext4_warning and ext4_err is to
print that information like this:
printk(KERN_CRIT
"EXT4-fs error (device %s): %s:%d: comm %s: %pV\n",
sb->s_id, function, line, current->comm, &vaf);
... and I wonder if it would make more sense to add something like to
ext4_msg(), just out of consistency's sake. Which of the debugging
messages were you finding this to be most helpful?
Well earlier ext4_mb_show_ac() was using ext4_msg() function.
But I changed that to use mb_debug() msg in patch-14 of this series,
since mb_debug() is meant for those debug msgs.
So I am completely ok if we think this patch is unnecessary, that's also
why I kept this patch at the end of the series to check opinion of
others.
FWIW, the mballoc issue which I was seeing was mostly due to a multi-
threaded application. And without name/pid of the process/threads, it
was difficult to identify which debug msgs belonged to which threads.
For this reason I thought such info in ext4_msg() would also help in
future.
Thanks for taking both patch series!
-ritesh