On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:03:54AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 04:56:34PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: > > On 2020/5/15 16:04, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:41PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: > > > > Move hung_task sysctl interface to hung_task_sysctl.c. > > > > Use register_sysctl() to register the sysctl interface to avoid > > > > merge conflicts when different features modify sysctl.c at the same time. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 8 +---- > > > > kernel/Makefile | 4 ++- > > > > kernel/hung_task.c | 6 ++-- > > > > kernel/hung_task.h | 21 ++++++++++++ > > > > kernel/hung_task_sysctl.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > Why a separate file? That ends up needing changes to Makefile, the > > > creation of a new header file, etc. Why not just put it all into > > > hung_task.c directly? > > > > > > -Kees > > > > > But Luis Chamberlain's suggestion is to put the hung_task sysctl code in a > > separate file. Details are in https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/13/762. > > I am a little confused, not sure which way is better. > > Ah, yes, I see now. Luis, I disagree with your recommendation here -- I > think complicating the Makefile is much less intuitive than just > wrapping this code in an #ifdef block in the existing .c file. That's fine, sorry for the trouble Xiaoming. Luis
