KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > I don't mesure it yet. I don't like this patch. > maybe, it decrease other typical benchmark. Yes but running with this patch would allow us to verify that we understand what is causing the problem. There are other solutions like skipping to the next partial slab on the list that could fix performance issues that the patch may cause. A test will give us: 1. Confirmation that the memory use is caused by the trylock. 2. Some performance numbers. If these show a regression then we have some markers that we can measure other solutions against. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
