Re: [PATCH 0/7] Discard requests, v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 19:04 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Anything else I need to address before you pull the tree? Any comment on
> > the BLKDISCARD ioctl? I've left that one using the non-barrier version
> > since it's waiting for it anyway, and shouldn't be happening
> > concurrently with anything else.
> 
> What makes you think a userspace filesystem or database wouldn't call
> BLKDISCARD concurrently with anything else?

The BLKDISCARD ioctl is synchronous -- I haven't done an aio version of
it. Issuing a write to the same sectors before it finishes would be kind
of silly.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux