Re: [PATCH 0/7] Discard requests, v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 14:04 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Or just match the check before -EOPNOTSUPP with bio_has_data(),
> > since it only applies to a barrier that carries data.
> 
> Like this, you mean? Empty barriers don't get to there?

Seems to work, although I'm somewhat dubious about it. Still, if you're
happy that it's correct and you really prefer it that way, then I can
commit it.

Anything else I need to address before you pull the tree? Any comment on
the BLKDISCARD ioctl? I've left that one using the non-barrier version
since it's waiting for it anyway, and shouldn't be happening
concurrently with anything else.

(http://,git://} git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/discard-2.6.git

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux