Re: improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:31:55AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
> documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
> spread over the callers into the core API.

I appreciate all the work you're doing here.

Do you have plans to introduce a better-named API than set_fs() / get_fs()?

Also, having set_fs() return the previous value of 'fs' would simplify
a lot of the callers.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux