Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel: better document the use_mm/unuse_mm API contract

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:31:57AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Switch the function documentation to kerneldoc comments, and add
> WARN_ON_ONCE asserts that the calling thread is a kernel thread and
> does not have ->mm set (or has ->mm set in the case of unuse_mm).
> 
> Also give the functions a kthread_ prefix to better document the
> use case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [usb]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux