Re: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Aleksa Sarai:

> It would just give you -EXDEV (or perhaps -EREMOTE) if you walk into an
> automount (the same logic as with the other RESOLVE_NO_* flags). We
> could make it -ENOENT if you prefer, but that means userspace can't tell
> the difference between it hitting an automount and the target actually
> not existing.

Maybe there's a better way to show the difference to userspace
involving something related to O_PATH?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux