What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?
From: Askar Safin <safinaskar@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 01:41:41 +0300
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: Askar Safin <safinaskar@xxxxxxx>

What about adding stat's AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?


==
Askar Safin
https://github.com/safinaskar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?
  - From: Aleksa Sarai

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC v2 5/5] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal
Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] orangefs: a fix and two cleanups and a merge conflict
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC v2 2/5] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free
Next by thread: Re: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux