Rene Herman wrote:
On 03-08-08 23:25, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Do we have to once again explain that slab still outperforms slub on at
least one important benchmark? I hope Nick Piggin finds time to finish
tuning slqb; it already outperforms slub.
No, you don't have to. I haven't merged that patch nor do I intend to
do so until the regressions are fixed.
And yes, I'm still waiting to hear from you how we're now doing with
higher order page allocations...
General interested question -- I recently "accidentally" read some of
slub and I believe that it doesn't feature the cache colouring support
that slab did? Is that true, and if so, wasn't it needed/useful?
I don't know why Christoph decided not to implement it. Christoph?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
