On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 07:21:01PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > - Add a patch that obsoletes SLAB and explains why SLOB does not support > defrag (Either of those could be theoretically equipped to support > slab defrag in some way but it seems that Andrew/Linus want to reduce > the number of slab allocators). Do we have to once again explain that slab still outperforms slub on at least one important benchmark? I hope Nick Piggin finds time to finish tuning slqb; it already outperforms slub. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
