On Fr, 03.04.20 16:36, David Howells (dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > BTW, while we are at it: one more thing I'd love to see exposed by > > statx() is a simple flag whether the inode is a mount point. > > Note that an inode or a dentry might be a mount point in one namespace, but > not in another. Do you actually mean an inode - or do you actually mean the > (mount,dentry) pair that you're looking at? (Ie. should it be namespace > specific?) yes, it should be specific to the mount hierarchy in the current namespace. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin
