Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've still not heard a convincing argument in favor of a syscall. >From your own results, scanning 10000 mounts through mountfs and reading just two values from each is an order of magnitude slower without the effect of the dentry/inode caches. It gets faster on the second run because the mountfs dentries and inodes are cached - but at a cost of >205MiB of RAM. And it's *still* slower than fsinfo(). David
