Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> When hackbench running, SLUB consume memory very largely than SLAB.
> then, SLAB often outperform SLUB in memory stavation state.
> 
> I don't know why memory comsumption different.
> Anyone know it?

Can you quantify the difference?

SLAB buffers objects in its queues. SLUB does rely more on the page allocator.
So SLAB may have its own reserves to fall back on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux