Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Vaguely on this topic, has anyone studied the effects of SLAB/SLUB
> etc. on MMUless systems?

The reason is that MMU-less systems are extremely sensitive to
fragmentation.  Every program started on those systems must allocate a
large contiguous block for the code and data, and every malloc >1 page
is the same.  If memory is too fragmented, starting new programs fails.

The high-order page-allocator defragmentation lately should help with
that.

The different behaviours of SLAB/SLUB might result in different levels
of fragmentation, so I wonder if anyone has compared them on MMU-less
systems or fragmentation-sensitive workloads on general systems.

Thanks,
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux