On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > Huh? I did exactly that, and that patch got NAK'ed by you and Nick: > > Umm. That was during the late -rc sequence (what, -rc8?) where I wanted a > minimal "let's fix it". Not that anybody then apparently cared, which is > probably just as well. > > Then you did NOTHING AT ALL about it, now the merge window is over, and > you complain again, with what looks like basically the same patch that was > already rejected earlier. > > Hellooo.. You are being unfair: after having talked it over with Nick I resubmitted this patch (not the same), which was added to -mm and nobody complained then. Then it got thrown out of -mm during the merge window because of a conflict, and then now I got around to resubmitting it again. But you're the boss, if you don't like it it won't go in. I'll have a look at the "don't clear PG_uptodate" solution again and see if we can get an agreement there. Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
